Cupix
Cupix scores 2/100 on xpay's Agent-Ready Index v2: partial pricing visibility.
Cupix pricing
Sales-led pricing
The pricing page body text contains no pricing tiers, rates, or cost information. The page focuses on product features and use cases, with primary CTAs being 'Request Demo' and navigation to sales/contact channels. This is a classic sales-only model for enterprise B2B software.
How Cupix scores on the agent-ready dimensions
Public pricing visibility
2 / 15
Self-serve checkout
0 / 15
Public API + docs
0 / 20
Usage-based / metered pricing
0 / 20
Free entry path
0 / 7
No sales call required
0 / 7
Card / wallet / x402 payment
0 / 6
Machine-readable bonus (MCP / OpenAPI)
0 / 10
Total
2 / 100
Six-step check: can an agent actually buy from Cupix?
Discover price
Select a plan
Pay per task
Avoid a sales call
API docs without auth
Estimate cost upfront
Pros and cons for AI agents
Observational summary written by xpay from the signals captured on 2026-05-06. Not a review of the product — only of its current pricing posture for agent buyers.- Pricing is publicly visible on an indexable page — agents can read tiers without scraping past auth.
- No per-unit price was advertised, so an agent has no way to estimate the cost of a single task.
- All advertised tiers route to a sales contact form; an agent cannot complete a purchase autonomously.
- API documentation is gated or absent; an agent cannot inspect the integration surface without authentication.
- No /.well-known/ai-pricing.json or equivalent machine-readable pricing manifest is published — agents must rely on HTML scraping.
How Cupix could lift its score
Add a per-unit price (e.g. $X / 1K calls) to the pricing page so an agent can compute its own cost before committing.
| pricing_visible | true |
| headline_phrasing | Turn 360° Video intoEnd-to-End Spatial AI withOur Digital Twin Platform — Join thousands of global leaders across construction, oil & gas, manufacturing, and government who use Cupix to digitize their physical sites. From reducing site visits to tracking changes and validating work, our 4D digital twin platform helps teams share spatial context and maintain complete site records. |
| tier_count | 1 |
| lowest_paid_entry_usd | null |
| free_tier | false |
| free_tier_terms | null |
| per_unit_price | null |
| annual_required | false |
| self_serve_paid_tiers | 0 |
| sales_only_tiers | 1 |
| public_api_docs_url | null |
| api_docs_auth_walled | null |
| ai_pricing_json_present | false |
| agents_txt_present | false |
| anonymous_purchase_path | false |
| per_unit_classification | null |
| usage_headline_present | false |
| custom_tier_present | false |
| agent_friendly | {"ai_pricing_json":false,"agents_txt":false,"llms_txt":false,"sitemap_xml":true,"mcp_server_card":false,"agent_skills_index":false,"x402_supported":false} |
View raw extracted page text →
Claim this scorecard & lift your score.
Get the breakdown of every signal we measured, the one-line fix, and how your peers in Jobsite Management stack up.
Compare the agent-ready picks in Jobsite Management.
If you're building or running an AI agent that needs to buy from this category, see who's scoring highest right now.
See agent-ready picksCupix
2
/ 100 (rubric v2.0)Jobsite Management
Not advertised
1
No
Sales-led
0 / 1
Auth-walled
No
Not published
2026-05-08
Sales-led pricing
Discovery files and protocols
Side-channel signals — informational, not part of the score. Each protocol is independent; adoption signals the publisher is thinking about agent buyers.ai-pricing.json
agents.txt
llms.txt
sitemap.xml
MCP Server Card
Agent Skills
x402 / MPP
Compare Cupix with peers
Highest-scoring companies in the same category that an AI agent might evaluate as an alternative.Fieldlens by RedTeam
54
Spigot
52
freshOps
49
Trade-Up
49
Smartapp.com PRO
42
TOOLTRIBE
42
Site Specs
38
Emac
37
Explore the Agent-Ready SaaS Index
25,480+ SaaS scored on agent-buyability — browse by readiness band, category, or jump straight to a pay-per-run tool on xpay.tools.