Equip
Equip scores 19/100 on xpay's Agent-Ready Index v2: partial pricing visibility.
Equip — 2 products
Free Forever
Contact sales
Paid
Contact sales
How Equip scores on the agent-ready dimensions
Public pricing visibility
15 / 15
Self-serve checkout
0 / 15
Public API + docs
0 / 20
Usage-based / metered pricing
0 / 20
Free entry path
4 / 7
No sales call required
0 / 7
Card / wallet / x402 payment
0 / 6
Machine-readable bonus (MCP / OpenAPI)
0 / 10
Total
19 / 100
Six-step check: can an agent actually buy from Equip?
Discover price
Select a plan
Pay per task
Avoid a sales call
API docs without auth
Estimate cost upfront
Pros and cons for AI agents
Observational summary written by xpay from the signals captured on 2026-05-06. Not a review of the product — only of its current pricing posture for agent buyers.- Pricing is publicly visible on an indexable page — agents can read tiers without scraping past auth.
- Every advertised tier is self-serve; no tier requires scheduling a call.
- A free tier exists, lowering the bar for an agent builder to prototype before committing budget.
- No per-unit price was advertised, so an agent has no way to estimate the cost of a single task.
- API documentation is gated or absent; an agent cannot inspect the integration surface without authentication.
- No /.well-known/ai-pricing.json or equivalent machine-readable pricing manifest is published — agents must rely on HTML scraping.
- The pricing URL did not render numeric tier data on the scoring date — possibly a router or sales-led landing page.
How Equip could lift its score
Add a per-unit price (e.g. $X / 1K calls) to the pricing page so an agent can compute its own cost before committing.
| pricing_visible | false |
| headline_phrasing | Pricing — Intelligent candidate tracking system |
| tier_count | 0 |
| lowest_paid_entry_usd | null |
| free_tier | true |
| free_tier_terms | null |
| per_unit_price | null |
| annual_required | false |
| self_serve_paid_tiers | 0 |
| sales_only_tiers | 1 |
| public_api_docs_url | null |
| api_docs_auth_walled | null |
| ai_pricing_json_present | false |
| agents_txt_present | false |
| anonymous_purchase_path | false |
| per_unit_classification | null |
| usage_headline_present | false |
| custom_tier_present | true |
| agent_friendly | {"ai_pricing_json":false,"agents_txt":false,"llms_txt":true,"sitemap_xml":true,"mcp_server_card":false,"agent_skills_index":false,"x402_supported":false} |
View raw extracted page text →
Claim this scorecard & lift your score.
Get the breakdown of every signal we measured, the one-line fix, and how your peers in Talent Assessment stack up.
Compare the agent-ready picks in Talent Assessment.
If you're building or running an AI agent that needs to buy from this category, see who's scoring highest right now.
See agent-ready picksEquip
19
/ 100 (rubric v2.0)Talent Assessment
Pricing — Intelligent candidate tracking system
0
Yes
Sales-led
0 / 1
Auth-walled
No
Not published
2026-05-09
Multi-product subscription
Equip pricing starts at ₹90 per candidate for AI Interview quizzes; free forever ATS plan available with referral; paid ATS plan ₹900 per user per month (minimum 5 users). Billed monthly.
Free ATS plan
Discovery files and protocols
Side-channel signals — informational, not part of the score. Each protocol is independent; adoption signals the publisher is thinking about agent buyers.ai-pricing.json
agents.txt
llms.txt
sitemap.xml
MCP Server Card
Agent Skills
x402 / MPP
Compare Equip with peers
Highest-scoring companies in the same category that an AI agent might evaluate as an alternative.WeCP
69
HireBeast
67
GO PLATFORM
61
HackerEarth
49
TestGorilla
49
RepScout
46
TalentBot by Talismatic
42
HackerRank
39
Explore the Agent-Ready SaaS Index
25,480+ SaaS scored on agent-buyability — browse by readiness band, category, or jump straight to a pay-per-run tool on xpay.tools.