Feedcoyote
Feedcoyote's pricing URL resolves, but plan structure is not surfaced clearly enough for an agent to enumerate without hand-parsing. No per-unit price was found on the page; an agent has no direct way to estimate the cost of a single task. All advertised paths route to a sales conversation rather than a self-serve checkout. Public API documentation is reachable without an auth wall.
Feedcoyote pricing
We’re still verifying Feedcoyote’s pricing
No pricing numbers are visible on the page; only a free sign‑up call‑to‑action is present, so the pricing model is marked as unverified.
Source of truth: feedcoyote.com/
How Feedcoyote scores on the agent-ready dimensions
Public pricing
10 / 15
Usage-based / metered
0 / 25
Self-serve checkout
0 / 15
Public API
15 / 15
Low / no minimum
0 / 10
Unauth automated payment
0 / 10
Bonus (machine-readable pricing)On top of /100 base
0 / 5
Total
34 / 100
Six-step check: can an agent actually buy from Feedcoyote?
Discover price
Select a plan
Pay per task
Avoid a sales call
API docs without auth
Estimate cost upfront
Pros and cons for AI agents
Observational summary written by xpay from the signals captured on 2026-05-06. Not a review of the product — only of its current pricing posture for agent buyers.- Pricing is publicly visible on an indexable page — agents can read tiers without scraping past auth.
- No per-unit price was advertised, so an agent has no way to estimate the cost of a single task.
- All advertised tiers route to a sales contact form; an agent cannot complete a purchase autonomously.
- API documentation is gated or absent; an agent cannot inspect the integration surface without authentication.
- No /.well-known/ai-pricing.json or equivalent machine-readable pricing manifest is published — agents must rely on HTML scraping.
How Feedcoyote could lift its score
Add a per-unit price (e.g. $X / 1K calls) to the pricing page so an agent can compute its own cost before committing.
| pricing_visible | true |
| headline_phrasing | Finally, a Place Where Freelancers Thrive — Connect, Collaborate & Earn More Together! |
| tier_count | 1 |
| lowest_paid_entry_usd | null |
| free_tier | false |
| free_tier_terms | null |
| per_unit_price | null |
| annual_required | false |
| self_serve_paid_tiers | 0 |
| sales_only_tiers | 1 |
| public_api_docs_url | https://feedcoyote.com/docs |
| api_docs_auth_walled | false |
| ai_pricing_json_present | false |
| agents_txt_present | false |
| anonymous_purchase_path | false |
| per_unit_classification | null |
| usage_headline_present | false |
| custom_tier_present | false |
| agent_friendly | {"ai_pricing_json":false,"agents_txt":false,"llms_txt":false,"sitemap_xml":true,"mcp_server_card":false,"agent_skills_index":false,"x402_supported":false} |
View raw extracted page text →
Claim this scorecard & lift your score.
Get the breakdown of every signal we measured, the one-line fix, and how your peers in Freelance Platforms stack up.
Compare the agent-ready picks in Freelance Platforms.
If you're building or running an AI agent that needs to buy from this category, see who's scoring highest right now.
See agent-ready picksFeedcoyote
34
/ 100 (rubric v1.1)Freelance Platforms
Finally, a Place Where Freelancers Thrive — Connect, Collaborate & Earn More Together!
1
No
Sales-led
0 / 1
Public
No
Not published
2026-05-06
Discovery files and protocols
Side-channel signals — informational, not part of the score. Each protocol is independent; adoption signals the publisher is thinking about agent buyers.ai-pricing.json
agents.txt
llms.txt
sitemap.xml
MCP Server Card
Agent Skills
x402 / MPP
Compare Feedcoyote with peers
Highest-scoring companies in the same category that an AI agent might evaluate as an alternative.Floutwork
60
Full Scope Freelancer
56
Lancerkit
55
Moxie
52
SimpleWork
52
Fructu
51
Doughnut
50
TechKluster
49
Explore the Agent-Ready SaaS Index
25,480+ SaaS scored on agent-buyability — browse by readiness band, category, or jump straight to a pay-per-run tool on xpay.tools.