Image Splitter
Image Splitter publishes a pricing page with 2 discoverable plan tier(s). No per-unit price was found on the page; an agent has no direct way to estimate the cost of a single task. All advertised paths route to a sales conversation rather than a self-serve checkout. No public API documentation URL was discovered.
Image Splitter pricing
We’re still verifying Image Splitter’s pricing
The page provides no pricing information; the tool appears to be free to use with no paid tiers, so the model is marked unverified and most fields are null.
Source of truth: imagesplitter.vip/
How Image Splitter scores on the agent-ready dimensions
Public pricing
15 / 15
Usage-based / metered
0 / 25
Self-serve checkout
0 / 15
Public API
0 / 15
Low / no minimum
0 / 10
Unauth automated payment
0 / 10
Bonus (machine-readable pricing)On top of /100 base
0 / 5
Total
20 / 100
Six-step check: can an agent actually buy from Image Splitter?
Discover price
Select a plan
Pay per task
Avoid a sales call
API docs without auth
Estimate cost upfront
Pros and cons for AI agents
Observational summary written by xpay from the signals captured on 2026-05-06. Not a review of the product — only of its current pricing posture for agent buyers.- Pricing is publicly visible on an indexable page — agents can read tiers without scraping past auth.
- No per-unit price was advertised, so an agent has no way to estimate the cost of a single task.
- All advertised tiers route to a sales contact form; an agent cannot complete a purchase autonomously.
- API documentation is gated or absent; an agent cannot inspect the integration surface without authentication.
- No /.well-known/ai-pricing.json or equivalent machine-readable pricing manifest is published — agents must rely on HTML scraping.
How Image Splitter could lift its score
Add a per-unit price (e.g. $X / 1K calls) to the pricing page so an agent can compute its own cost before committing.
| pricing_visible | true |
| headline_phrasing | Image Splitter: Divide Your Images with Precision — ...or drag and drop an image. |
| tier_count | 2 |
| lowest_paid_entry_usd | null |
| free_tier | false |
| free_tier_terms | null |
| per_unit_price | null |
| annual_required | false |
| self_serve_paid_tiers | 0 |
| sales_only_tiers | 1 |
| public_api_docs_url | null |
| api_docs_auth_walled | null |
| ai_pricing_json_present | false |
| agents_txt_present | false |
| anonymous_purchase_path | false |
| per_unit_classification | null |
| usage_headline_present | false |
| custom_tier_present | true |
| agent_friendly | {"ai_pricing_json":false,"agents_txt":false,"llms_txt":false,"sitemap_xml":true,"mcp_server_card":false,"agent_skills_index":false,"x402_supported":false} |
View raw extracted page text →
Claim this scorecard & lift your score.
Get the breakdown of every signal we measured, the one-line fix, and how your peers in Photo Editing stack up.
Compare the agent-ready picks in Photo Editing.
If you're building or running an AI agent that needs to buy from this category, see who's scoring highest right now.
See agent-ready picksImage Splitter
20
/ 100 (rubric v1.1)Photo Editing
Image Splitter: Divide Your Images with Precision — ...or drag and drop an image.
2
No
Sales-led
0 / 1
Auth-walled
No
Not published
2026-05-06
Discovery files and protocols
Side-channel signals — informational, not part of the score. Each protocol is independent; adoption signals the publisher is thinking about agent buyers.ai-pricing.json
agents.txt
llms.txt
sitemap.xml
MCP Server Card
Agent Skills
x402 / MPP
Compare Image Splitter with peers
Highest-scoring companies in the same category that an AI agent might evaluate as an alternative.Renderform
87
Slazzer
85
novita.ai
80
Vmake
78
ImageEdit.AI
78
withoutBG
72
Deep Image AI
70
X-Design
69
Explore the Agent-Ready SaaS Index
25,480+ SaaS scored on agent-buyability — browse by readiness band, category, or jump straight to a pay-per-run tool on xpay.tools.