Peoplebox
Peoplebox scores 24/100 on xpay's Agent-Ready Index v2: partial pricing visibility; checkout requires assistance.
Peoplebox pricing
Performance Management
$96/yr
~$8.00/mo equivIndividual Development Plans (Add-on)
$36/yr
~$3.00/mo equivEngagement (Add-on)
$24/yr
~$2.00/mo equiv360 Degree Feedback (Add-on)
$96/yr
~$8.00/mo equivCompensation (Add-on)
$60/yr
~$5.00/mo equivHow Peoplebox scores on the agent-ready dimensions
Public pricing visibility
13 / 15
Self-serve checkout
11 / 15
Public API + docs
0 / 20
Usage-based / metered pricing
0 / 20
Free entry path
0 / 7
No sales call required
0 / 7
Card / wallet / x402 payment
0 / 6
Machine-readable bonus (MCP / OpenAPI)
0 / 10
Total
24 / 100
Six-step check: can an agent actually buy from Peoplebox?
Discover price
Select a plan
Pay per task
Avoid a sales call
API docs without auth
Estimate cost upfront
Pros and cons for AI agents
Observational summary written by xpay from the signals captured on 2026-05-06. Not a review of the product — only of its current pricing posture for agent buyers.- Pricing is publicly visible on an indexable page — agents can read tiers without scraping past auth.
- Every advertised tier is self-serve; no tier requires scheduling a call.
- No per-unit price was advertised, so an agent has no way to estimate the cost of a single task.
- API documentation is gated or absent; an agent cannot inspect the integration surface without authentication.
- No /.well-known/ai-pricing.json or equivalent machine-readable pricing manifest is published — agents must rely on HTML scraping.
How Peoplebox could lift its score
Add a per-unit price (e.g. $X / 1K calls) to the pricing page so an agent can compute its own cost before committing.
| pricing_visible | true |
| headline_phrasing | Pricing - Peoplebox.ai — Introducing Nova your AI Talent Partner |
| tier_count | 3 |
| lowest_paid_entry_usd | null |
| free_tier | false |
| free_tier_terms | null |
| per_unit_price | null |
| annual_required | false |
| self_serve_paid_tiers | 0 |
| sales_only_tiers | 1 |
| public_api_docs_url | null |
| api_docs_auth_walled | null |
| ai_pricing_json_present | false |
| agents_txt_present | false |
| anonymous_purchase_path | false |
| per_unit_classification | null |
| usage_headline_present | false |
| custom_tier_present | true |
| agent_friendly | {"ai_pricing_json":false,"agents_txt":false,"llms_txt":true,"sitemap_xml":true,"mcp_server_card":false,"agent_skills_index":false,"x402_supported":false} |
View raw extracted page text →
Claim this scorecard & lift your score.
Get the breakdown of every signal we measured, the one-line fix, and how your peers in Objectives And Key Results stack up.
Compare the agent-ready picks in Objectives And Key Results.
If you're building or running an AI agent that needs to buy from this category, see who's scoring highest right now.
See agent-ready picksPeoplebox
24
/ 100 (rubric v2.0)Objectives And Key Results
Pricing - Peoplebox.ai — Introducing Nova your AI Talent Partner
3
No
Sales-led
0 / 1
Auth-walled
No
Not published
2026-05-08
Annual-only tier subscription
Discovery files and protocols
Side-channel signals — informational, not part of the score. Each protocol is independent; adoption signals the publisher is thinking about agent buyers.ai-pricing.json
agents.txt
llms.txt
sitemap.xml
MCP Server Card
Agent Skills
x402 / MPP
Compare Peoplebox with peers
Highest-scoring companies in the same category that an AI agent might evaluate as an alternative.Gtmhub
75
Koan
68
Jell
66
Perdoo
64
Commonality
63
Talbit
62
Normalyz
62
GroSum
60
Explore the Agent-Ready SaaS Index
25,480+ SaaS scored on agent-buyability — browse by readiness band, category, or jump straight to a pay-per-run tool on xpay.tools.
