Quick eSelling
Quick eSelling scores 19/100 on xpay's Agent-Ready Index v2: partial pricing visibility.
Quick eSelling pricing
Free
Free
foreverEnterprise
Contact sales
How Quick eSelling scores on the agent-ready dimensions
Public pricing visibility
15 / 15
Self-serve checkout
0 / 15
Public API + docs
0 / 20
Usage-based / metered pricing
0 / 20
Free entry path
4 / 7
No sales call required
0 / 7
Card / wallet / x402 payment
0 / 6
Machine-readable bonus (MCP / OpenAPI)
0 / 10
Total
19 / 100
Six-step check: can an agent actually buy from Quick eSelling?
Discover price
Select a plan
Pay per task
Avoid a sales call
API docs without auth
Estimate cost upfront
Pros and cons for AI agents
Observational summary written by xpay from the signals captured on 2026-05-06. Not a review of the product — only of its current pricing posture for agent buyers.- Pricing is publicly visible on an indexable page — agents can read tiers without scraping past auth.
- Every advertised tier is self-serve; no tier requires scheduling a call.
- A free tier exists, lowering the bar for an agent builder to prototype before committing budget.
- No per-unit price was advertised, so an agent has no way to estimate the cost of a single task.
- API documentation is gated or absent; an agent cannot inspect the integration surface without authentication.
- No /.well-known/ai-pricing.json or equivalent machine-readable pricing manifest is published — agents must rely on HTML scraping.
How Quick eSelling could lift its score
Add a per-unit price (e.g. $X / 1K calls) to the pricing page so an agent can compute its own cost before committing.
| pricing_visible | true |
| headline_phrasing | Pricing-Us — In the free plan, apart from all the free features, you will get an android mobile app link within 10 minutes of your signup. You can use this link to install your E-commerce app on your android phone and review it and share the link with your clients or upload it on google play store. You can write to support[at]quickeselling[dot] com to request abb file for uploading on play store. |
| tier_count | 4 |
| lowest_paid_entry_usd | null |
| free_tier | true |
| free_tier_terms | null |
| per_unit_price | null |
| annual_required | false |
| self_serve_paid_tiers | 0 |
| sales_only_tiers | 1 |
| public_api_docs_url | null |
| api_docs_auth_walled | null |
| ai_pricing_json_present | false |
| agents_txt_present | false |
| anonymous_purchase_path | false |
| per_unit_classification | null |
| usage_headline_present | false |
| custom_tier_present | true |
| agent_friendly | {"ai_pricing_json":false,"agents_txt":false,"llms_txt":true,"sitemap_xml":true,"mcp_server_card":false,"agent_skills_index":false,"x402_supported":false} |
View raw extracted page text →
Claim this scorecard & lift your score.
Get the breakdown of every signal we measured, the one-line fix, and how your peers in Ecommerce stack up.
Compare the agent-ready picks in Ecommerce.
If you're building or running an AI agent that needs to buy from this category, see who's scoring highest right now.
See agent-ready picksQuick eSelling
19
/ 100 (rubric v2.0)Ecommerce
Not advertised
4
Yes
Sales-led
0 / 1
Auth-walled
No
Not published
2026-05-09
Tier-based subscription
Discovery files and protocols
Side-channel signals — informational, not part of the score. Each protocol is independent; adoption signals the publisher is thinking about agent buyers.ai-pricing.json
agents.txt
llms.txt
sitemap.xml
MCP Server Card
Agent Skills
x402 / MPP
Compare Quick eSelling with peers
Highest-scoring companies in the same category that an AI agent might evaluate as an alternative.Comecero
71
Lightspeed eCom
70
MarketForce 360
70
1ShoppingCart
69
StoreHippo
67
Sharetribe
66
Swell
66
CommerceUp
66
Explore the Agent-Ready SaaS Index
25,480+ SaaS scored on agent-buyability — browse by readiness band, category, or jump straight to a pay-per-run tool on xpay.tools.