UpKepr
UpKepr publishes a pricing page with 2 discoverable plan tier(s). No per-unit price was found on the page; an agent has no direct way to estimate the cost of a single task. All advertised paths route to a sales conversation rather than a self-serve checkout. Public API documentation is reachable without an auth wall. A free or freemium tier is offered.
UpKepr pricing
We’re still verifying UpKepr’s pricing
The page only offers a free website audit with no paid tiers or pricing numbers, so the pricing model cannot be classified beyond a free tier.
Source of truth: upkepr.com/
How UpKepr scores on the agent-ready dimensions
Public pricing
15 / 15
Usage-based / metered
0 / 25
Self-serve checkout
0 / 15
Public API
15 / 15
Low / no minimum
8 / 10
Unauth automated payment
0 / 10
Bonus (machine-readable pricing)On top of /100 base
0 / 5
Total
42 / 100
Six-step check: can an agent actually buy from UpKepr?
Discover price
Select a plan
Pay per task
Avoid a sales call
API docs without auth
Estimate cost upfront
Pros and cons for AI agents
Observational summary written by xpay from the signals captured on 2026-05-06. Not a review of the product — only of its current pricing posture for agent buyers.- Pricing is publicly visible on an indexable page — agents can read tiers without scraping past auth.
- A free tier exists, lowering the bar for an agent builder to prototype before committing budget.
- No per-unit price was advertised, so an agent has no way to estimate the cost of a single task.
- All advertised tiers route to a sales contact form; an agent cannot complete a purchase autonomously.
- API documentation is gated or absent; an agent cannot inspect the integration surface without authentication.
- No /.well-known/ai-pricing.json or equivalent machine-readable pricing manifest is published — agents must rely on HTML scraping.
How UpKepr could lift its score
Add a per-unit price (e.g. $X / 1K calls) to the pricing page so an agent can compute its own cost before committing.
| pricing_visible | true |
| headline_phrasing | Free Website Audit for GEO & SEO — Free AI visibility & GEO score for your site |
| tier_count | 2 |
| lowest_paid_entry_usd | null |
| free_tier | true |
| free_tier_terms | null |
| per_unit_price | null |
| annual_required | false |
| self_serve_paid_tiers | 0 |
| sales_only_tiers | 1 |
| public_api_docs_url | https://upkepr.com/ |
| api_docs_auth_walled | false |
| ai_pricing_json_present | false |
| agents_txt_present | false |
| anonymous_purchase_path | false |
| per_unit_classification | null |
| usage_headline_present | false |
| custom_tier_present | false |
| agent_friendly | {"ai_pricing_json":false,"agents_txt":false,"llms_txt":false,"sitemap_xml":true,"mcp_server_card":false,"agent_skills_index":false,"x402_supported":false} |
View raw extracted page text →
Claim this scorecard & lift your score.
Get the breakdown of every signal we measured, the one-line fix, and how your peers in Website Monitoring stack up.
Compare the agent-ready picks in Website Monitoring.
If you're building or running an AI agent that needs to buy from this category, see who's scoring highest right now.
See agent-ready picksUpKepr
42
/ 100 (rubric v1.1)Website Monitoring
Free Website Audit for GEO & SEO — Free AI visibility & GEO score for your site
2
Yes
Sales-led
0 / 1
Public
No
Not published
2026-05-06
Discovery files and protocols
Side-channel signals — informational, not part of the score. Each protocol is independent; adoption signals the publisher is thinking about agent buyers.ai-pricing.json
agents.txt
llms.txt
sitemap.xml
MCP Server Card
Agent Skills
x402 / MPP
Compare UpKepr with peers
Highest-scoring companies in the same category that an AI agent might evaluate as an alternative.Phare
85
Fyipe
73
PingPing
73
Better Uptime
71
OneUptime
71
Pulsetic
71
GTmetrix
70
Nixstats
70
Explore the Agent-Ready SaaS Index
25,480+ SaaS scored on agent-buyability — browse by readiness band, category, or jump straight to a pay-per-run tool on xpay.tools.