Wudpecker
Wudpecker scores 30/100 on xpay's Agent-Ready Index v2: partial pricing visibility; checkout requires assistance.
Wudpecker pricing
Free
Free
foreverPlus
$19/mo
Pro
$32/mo
How Wudpecker scores on the agent-ready dimensions
Public pricing visibility
15 / 15
Self-serve checkout
11 / 15
Public API + docs
0 / 20
Usage-based / metered pricing
0 / 20
Free entry path
4 / 7
No sales call required
0 / 7
Card / wallet / x402 payment
0 / 6
Machine-readable bonus (MCP / OpenAPI)
0 / 10
Total
30 / 100
Six-step check: can an agent actually buy from Wudpecker?
Discover price
Select a plan
Pay per task
Avoid a sales call
API docs without auth
Estimate cost upfront
Pros and cons for AI agents
Observational summary written by xpay from the signals captured on 2026-05-06. Not a review of the product — only of its current pricing posture for agent buyers.- Pricing is publicly visible on an indexable page — agents can read tiers without scraping past auth.
- A free tier exists, lowering the bar for an agent builder to prototype before committing budget.
- No per-unit price was advertised, so an agent has no way to estimate the cost of a single task.
- All advertised tiers route to a sales contact form; an agent cannot complete a purchase autonomously.
- API documentation is gated or absent; an agent cannot inspect the integration surface without authentication.
- PPU requires account creation and an issued API key; a fully unauthenticated agent purchase is not yet supported.
- No /.well-known/ai-pricing.json or equivalent machine-readable pricing manifest is published — agents must rely on HTML scraping.
How Wudpecker could lift its score
Add a per-unit price (e.g. $X / 1K calls) to the pricing page so an agent can compute its own cost before committing.
| pricing_visible | true |
| headline_phrasing | Flexible forall users — When you’re at risk of going over your call limits, Wudpecker will send you an email notification with options for how to proceed. But if you have crossed the limit, then Wudpecker stops recording your meetings.Note: You can always start recording on the desktop or phone apps without any limit. |
| tier_count | 4 |
| lowest_paid_entry_usd | 0 |
| free_tier | true |
| free_tier_terms | null |
| per_unit_price | null |
| annual_required | true |
| self_serve_paid_tiers | 3 |
| sales_only_tiers | 0 |
| public_api_docs_url | null |
| api_docs_auth_walled | null |
| ai_pricing_json_present | false |
| agents_txt_present | false |
| anonymous_purchase_path | false |
| per_unit_classification | null |
| usage_headline_present | false |
| custom_tier_present | true |
| agent_friendly | {"ai_pricing_json":false,"agents_txt":false,"llms_txt":false,"sitemap_xml":true,"mcp_server_card":false,"agent_skills_index":false,"x402_supported":false} |
View raw extracted page text →
Claim this scorecard & lift your score.
Get the breakdown of every signal we measured, the one-line fix, and how your peers in Conversation Intelligence stack up.
Compare the agent-ready picks in Conversation Intelligence.
If you're building or running an AI agent that needs to buy from this category, see who's scoring highest right now.
See agent-ready picksWudpecker
30
/ 100 (rubric v2.0)Conversation Intelligence
Not advertised
4
Yes
Free
3 / 0
Auth-walled
No
Not published
2026-05-09
Tier-based subscription
Discovery files and protocols
Side-channel signals — informational, not part of the score. Each protocol is independent; adoption signals the publisher is thinking about agent buyers.ai-pricing.json
agents.txt
llms.txt
sitemap.xml
MCP Server Card
Agent Skills
x402 / MPP
Compare Wudpecker with peers
Highest-scoring companies in the same category that an AI agent might evaluate as an alternative.TIXAE Agents
85
NLX
76
Marsview
72
Inferable.ai
69
Robylon AI
69
Chikka
69
Callin.io
66
Hoory AI
66
Explore the Agent-Ready SaaS Index
25,480+ SaaS scored on agent-buyability — browse by readiness band, category, or jump straight to a pay-per-run tool on xpay.tools.