Activepieces
Activepieces scores 19/100 on xpay's Agent-Ready Index v2: partial pricing visibility.
Activepieces pricing
Free
Free
foreverStandard
Contact sales
Unlimited
Contact sales
How Activepieces scores on the agent-ready dimensions
Public pricing visibility
15 / 15
Self-serve checkout
0 / 15
Public API + docs
0 / 20
Usage-based / metered pricing
0 / 20
Free entry path
4 / 7
No sales call required
0 / 7
Card / wallet / x402 payment
0 / 6
Machine-readable bonus (MCP / OpenAPI)
0 / 10
Total
19 / 100
Six-step check: can an agent actually buy from Activepieces?
Discover price
https://www.activepieces.com/pricing — explicit $5 per flowSelect a plan
Standard vs Unlimited (sales) tiersPay per task
Per-flow billing visible; runs unlimitedAvoid a sales call
Standard self-serveAPI docs without auth
https://www.activepieces.com/docs publicEstimate cost upfront
Per-flow rate clear and boundedPros and cons for AI agents
Observational summary written by xpay from the signals captured on 2026-05-03. Not a review of the product — only of its current pricing posture for agent buyers.- Pricing is publicly visible on an indexable page — agents can read tiers without scraping past auth.
- API documentation is reachable without a login — discovery and integration can happen in one session.
- No per-unit price was advertised, so an agent has no way to estimate the cost of a single task.
- Some tiers are sales-led; the highest-capacity surfaces are not self-serve.
- No /.well-known/ai-pricing.json or equivalent machine-readable pricing manifest is published — agents must rely on HTML scraping.
- A unit price is published but consumption per task is not declared upfront — cost predictability is partial.
How Activepieces could lift its score
Add a per-unit price (e.g. $X / 1K calls) to the pricing page so an agent can compute its own cost before committing.
| pricing_visible | true |
| headline_phrasing | Pricing — Unlimited runs. Empower every team with AI. |
| tier_count | 2 |
| lowest_paid_entry_usd | null |
| free_tier | false |
| free_tier_terms | null |
| per_unit_price | null |
| annual_required | false |
| self_serve_paid_tiers | 0 |
| sales_only_tiers | 1 |
| public_api_docs_url | https://www.activepieces.com/docs/getting-started/introduction |
| api_docs_auth_walled | false |
| ai_pricing_json_present | false |
| agents_txt_present | false |
| anonymous_purchase_path | false |
| per_unit_classification | null |
| usage_headline_present | false |
| custom_tier_present | false |
| agent_friendly | {"ai_pricing_json":false,"agents_txt":false,"llms_txt":false,"sitemap_xml":true,"mcp_server_card":false,"agent_skills_index":false,"x402_supported":false} |
View raw extracted page text →
Claim this scorecard & lift your score.
Get the breakdown of every signal we measured, the one-line fix, and how your peers in Workflow Automation stack up.
Compare the agent-ready picks in Workflow Automation.
If you're building or running an AI agent that needs to buy from this category, see who's scoring highest right now.
See agent-ready picksActivepieces
19
/ 100 (rubric v2.0)Workflow Automation
Pricing — Unlimited runs. Empower every team with AI.
2
No
Sales-led
0 / 1
Public
No
Not published
2026-05-09
Tier-based subscription
Discovery files and protocols
Side-channel signals — informational, not part of the score. Each protocol is independent; adoption signals the publisher is thinking about agent buyers.ai-pricing.json
agents.txt
llms.txt
sitemap.xml
MCP Server Card
Agent Skills
x402 / MPP
Compare Activepieces with peers
Highest-scoring companies in the same category that an AI agent might evaluate as an alternative.Make
77
Bardeen
73
Relay.app
68
Latenode
61
Pipedream
60
n8n
57
Zapier
56
Tray.io
15
Explore the Agent-Ready SaaS Index
25,480+ SaaS scored on agent-buyability — browse by readiness band, category, or jump straight to a pay-per-run tool on xpay.tools.