Done!
Done! publishes a pricing page with 2 discoverable plan tier(s). No per-unit price was found on the page; an agent has no direct way to estimate the cost of a single task. All advertised paths route to a sales conversation rather than a self-serve checkout. No public API documentation URL was discovered.
Done! pricing
We’re still verifying Done!’s pricing
Pricing is presented as a custom quote with many line‑item prices rather than a simple tier ladder, so the model is classified as other_complex. Some numbers (e.g., $170 plan) are visible but not tied to a clear recurring billing cadence, leading to moderate confidence.
Source of truth: www.done.fyi/
How Done! scores on the agent-ready dimensions
Public pricing
15 / 15
Usage-based / metered
0 / 25
Self-serve checkout
0 / 15
Public API
0 / 15
Low / no minimum
10 / 10
Unauth automated payment
0 / 10
Bonus (machine-readable pricing)On top of /100 base
0 / 5
Total
31 / 100
Six-step check: can an agent actually buy from Done!?
Discover price
Select a plan
Pay per task
Avoid a sales call
API docs without auth
Estimate cost upfront
Pros and cons for AI agents
Observational summary written by xpay from the signals captured on 2026-05-06. Not a review of the product — only of its current pricing posture for agent buyers.- Pricing is publicly visible on an indexable page — agents can read tiers without scraping past auth.
- No per-unit price was advertised, so an agent has no way to estimate the cost of a single task.
- All advertised tiers route to a sales contact form; an agent cannot complete a purchase autonomously.
- API documentation is gated or absent; an agent cannot inspect the integration surface without authentication.
- No /.well-known/ai-pricing.json or equivalent machine-readable pricing manifest is published — agents must rely on HTML scraping.
How Done! could lift its score
Add a per-unit price (e.g. $X / 1K calls) to the pricing page so an agent can compute its own cost before committing.
| pricing_visible | true |
| headline_phrasing | Done Overview — Scalable cloud based digital solution accessible from any connected device |
| tier_count | 2 |
| lowest_paid_entry_usd | 0 |
| free_tier | false |
| free_tier_terms | null |
| per_unit_price | null |
| annual_required | true |
| self_serve_paid_tiers | 0 |
| sales_only_tiers | 1 |
| public_api_docs_url | null |
| api_docs_auth_walled | null |
| ai_pricing_json_present | false |
| agents_txt_present | false |
| anonymous_purchase_path | false |
| per_unit_classification | null |
| usage_headline_present | false |
| custom_tier_present | true |
| agent_friendly | {"ai_pricing_json":false,"agents_txt":false,"llms_txt":false,"sitemap_xml":false,"mcp_server_card":false,"agent_skills_index":false,"x402_supported":false} |
View raw extracted page text →
Claim this scorecard & lift your score.
Get the breakdown of every signal we measured, the one-line fix, and how your peers in Training Management Systems stack up.
Compare the agent-ready picks in Training Management Systems.
If you're building or running an AI agent that needs to buy from this category, see who's scoring highest right now.
See agent-ready picksDone!
31
/ 100 (rubric v1.1)Training Management Systems
Done Overview — Scalable cloud based digital solution accessible from any connected device
2
No
Free
0 / 1
Auth-walled
No
Not published
2026-05-06
Discovery files and protocols
Side-channel signals — informational, not part of the score. Each protocol is independent; adoption signals the publisher is thinking about agent buyers.ai-pricing.json
agents.txt
llms.txt
sitemap.xml
MCP Server Card
Agent Skills
x402 / MPP
Compare Done! with peers
Highest-scoring companies in the same category that an AI agent might evaluate as an alternative.Qualiobee
69
Arlo Training Management Software
62
Synapse
62
Chorck
55
Whale
49
ProProfs Training Maker
49
Hickory
49
Unified Training Tracking
49
Explore the Agent-Ready SaaS Index
25,480+ SaaS scored on agent-buyability — browse by readiness band, category, or jump straight to a pay-per-run tool on xpay.tools.