Tink
Tink scores 20/100 on xpay's Agent-Ready Index v2: partial pricing visibility; a public API exists with documentation.
Tink pricing
Sales-led pricing
Pricing is sales‑led with no public numbers; only Standard and Enterprise tiers are mentioned without prices.
How Tink scores on the agent-ready dimensions
Public pricing visibility
2 / 15
Self-serve checkout
0 / 15
Public API + docs
16 / 20
Usage-based / metered pricing
0 / 20
Free entry path
0 / 7
No sales call required
2 / 7
Card / wallet / x402 payment
0 / 6
Machine-readable bonus (MCP / OpenAPI)
0 / 10
Total
20 / 100
Can an autonomous agent transact here?
Can create account
Can enter payment method
Can upgrade plan
Can buy more usage
Can cancel online
Payment methods
Unknown
Human approval recommended
Pricing transparency
contact_only
Purchase motion
sales_led
Demo required
Unknown
Quote required
Unknown
Annual commit required
Unknown
Auto-renewal mentioned
Cancellation policy visible
Refund policy visible
Invoice payment available
Purchase orders supported
MSA required
Unknown
DPA available
Unknown
Security review required
Unknown
API & developer surface
API-first product
Sandbox present
Unknown
Webhooks
Unknown
MCP mentioned
Positioning & ecosystem
“Plans that scale with your business”
Buyer persona
Six-step check: can an agent actually buy from Tink?
Discover price
https://tink.com/pricing/ explicitly hides numbers from prospectsSelect a plan
Standard vs Enterprise visible at https://tink.com/pricing/ but rates redactedPay per task
No per-call price exposedAvoid a sales call
Page directs prospects to https://tink.com/contact-us/API docs without auth
https://docs.tink.com accessibleEstimate cost upfront
Per-unit pricing reserved for active customers per page copyPros and cons for AI agents
Observational summary written by xpay from the signals captured on 2026-05-03. Not a review of the product — only of its current pricing posture for agent buyers.- API documentation is reachable without a login — discovery and integration can happen in one session.
- No tier numbers were visible on the public pricing page during the scoring fetch — agents cannot evaluate cost without a sales conversation.
- No per-unit price was advertised, so an agent has no way to estimate the cost of a single task.
- All advertised tiers route to a sales contact form; an agent cannot complete a purchase autonomously.
- No /.well-known/ai-pricing.json or equivalent machine-readable pricing manifest is published — agents must rely on HTML scraping.
- The pricing URL did not render numeric tier data on the scoring date — possibly a router or sales-led landing page.
How Tink could lift its score
Add a per-unit price (e.g. $X / 1K calls) to the pricing page so an agent can compute its own cost before committing.
- Publish indicative per-call ranges for Account Check, Transactions, and Pay-by-Bank on /pricing/ so agents can shortlist Tink against peers.
- Add a card-backed PAYG path from console.tink.com for the lowest-volume markets without a sales handoff.
- Mirror the published rate card in /.well-known/ai-pricing.json so autonomous agents can compare Tink with Plaid, TrueLayer, and Yapily without scraping.
| pricing_visible | false |
| headline_phrasing | Plans that scale with your business — The prices listed on this page are applicable exclusively to our existing customers who have an active business relation with us. New prospects and potential clients should contact our sales team for personalised pricing information. |
| tier_count | 0 |
| lowest_paid_entry_usd | null |
| free_tier | false |
| free_tier_terms | null |
| per_unit_price | null |
| annual_required | false |
| self_serve_paid_tiers | 0 |
| sales_only_tiers | 1 |
| public_api_docs_url | null |
| api_docs_auth_walled | null |
| ai_pricing_json_present | false |
| agents_txt_present | false |
| anonymous_purchase_path | false |
| per_unit_classification | null |
| usage_headline_present | false |
| custom_tier_present | true |
| agent_friendly | {"ai_pricing_json":false,"agents_txt":false,"llms_txt":false,"sitemap_xml":false,"mcp_server_card":false,"agent_skills_index":false,"x402_supported":false} |
View raw extracted page text →
Claim this scorecard & lift your score.
Get the breakdown of every signal we measured, the one-line fix, and how your peers in Financial Data APIs stack up.
Compare the agent-ready picks in Financial Data APIs.
If you're building or running an AI agent that needs to buy from this category, see who's scoring highest right now.
See agent-ready picksTink
20
/ 100 (rubric v2.0)Financial Data APIs
Not advertised
0
No
Sales-led
0 / 1
Auth-walled
No
Not published
2026-05-09
Sales-led pricing
Contact sales · sales-led
Discovery files and protocols
Side-channel signals — informational, not part of the score. Each protocol is independent; adoption signals the publisher is thinking about agent buyers.ai-pricing.json
agents.txt
llms.txt
sitemap.xml
MCP Server Card
Agent Skills
x402 / MPP
Compare Tink with peers
Highest-scoring companies in the same category that an AI agent might evaluate as an alternative.Alpha Vantage
71
Plaid
68
Mastercard Finicity
8
MX
8
TrueLayer
8
Belvo
8
Codat
8
Rutter
8
Explore the Agent-Ready SaaS Index
25,480+ SaaS scored on agent-buyability — browse by readiness band, category, or jump straight to a pay-per-run tool on xpay.tools.
